Bowling Green · away
at
Final BGSU 7 – 56 NEB
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:00 · Memorial Stadium (Lincoln, NE)
Nebraska · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
NEB pass rush7.2% 8332nd9.5% 16953rdfaces BGSU4.3% 7056th5.8% ~1.9 sacks
BGSU pass rush9.2% 6517th10.7% 17831stfaces NEB3.2% 9333rd6.2% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BGSU with the ball

BGSU offence vs NEB defenceBGSU offenceNEB defencerank gap
points added per play-0.115136th-0.01843rd-93
success rate0.336135th0.36646th-89
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.958138th1.24178th-60
rush: points added per play-0.261138th0.00260th-78
rush: success rate0.302138th0.35537th-101
rush: explosiveness0.577136th1.050106th-30
pass: points added per play0.059111th-0.10712th-99
pass: success rate0.364119th0.34926th-93
pass: explosiveness1.447101st1.34220th-81
standard downs: success rate0.431124th0.46482nd-42
passing downs: success rate0.152137th0.1907th-130
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431135th2.89875th-60
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.246133rd0.18251st-82
short-yardage conversion rate0.72780th0.800108th+28
points per trip inside the 401.188138th2.61124th-114
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.194129th0.204121st-8
havoc allowed by the front seven0.138135th0.136119th-16
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05676th0.06890th+14
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30053rd——

NEB with the ball

NEB offence vs BGSU defenceNEB offenceBGSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.4146th0.227127th+121
success rate0.49825th0.492135th+110
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4398th1.29493rd+85
rush: points added per play0.3445th0.251132nd+127
rush: success rate0.49429th0.520137th+108
rush: explosiveness1.2595th1.216133rd+128
pass: points added per play0.49917th0.277106th+89
pass: success rate0.50031st0.477122nd+91
pass: explosiveness1.65845th1.43839th-6
standard downs: success rate0.51744th0.556136th+92
passing downs: success rate0.4494th0.30694th+90
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.40828th3.436133rd+105
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15251st0.16936th-15
short-yardage conversion rate0.72087th0.73981st-6
points per trip inside the 405.1929th4.231121st+112
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11023rd0.12013th-10
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07134th0.09156th+22
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03932nd0.0292nd-30
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.70087th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.