Wisconsin · neutral site
vs
Final WIS 13 – 41 ND
Sunday 2026-09-06 19:30 · Lambeau Field
Notre Dame · neutral site
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ND pass rush10.2% 10810th12.7% 21214thfaces WIS2.9% 10227th6.6% ~2.2 sacks
WIS pass rush3.3% 90101st6.6% 181114thfaces ND0.9% 1135th2.1% ~0.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WIS with the ball

WIS offence vs ND defenceWIS offenceND defencerank gap
points added per play0.14275th-0.11915th-60
success rate0.42389th0.34224th-65
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39119th1.13837th+18
rush: points added per play0.18344th-0.2298th-36
rush: success rate0.368122nd0.30412th-110
rush: explosiveness1.2416th0.81230th+24
pass: points added per play0.17688th-0.02126th-62
pass: success rate0.48836th0.37448th+12
pass: explosiveness1.50781st1.37825th-56
standard downs: success rate0.48282nd0.39022nd-60
passing downs: success rate0.30085th0.25344th-41
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94892nd2.32116th-76
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15455th0.223103rd+48
short-yardage conversion rate0.562127th0.73377th-50
points per trip inside the 403.333106th1.6252nd-104
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16399th0.240135th+36
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08155th0.169134th+79
havoc allowed by the secondary0.081127th0.07199th-28
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10098th——

ND with the ball

ND offence vs WIS defenceND offenceWIS defencerank gap
points added per play0.33313th-0.05130th+17
success rate0.51613th0.34022nd+9
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.116122nd1.04213th-109
rush: points added per play0.14265th0.07888th+23
rush: success rate0.48238th0.33830th-8
rush: explosiveness0.795114th0.87251st-63
pass: points added per play0.56311th-0.03024th+13
pass: success rate0.55811th0.37246th+35
pass: explosiveness1.45996th1.1873rd-93
standard downs: success rate0.5996th0.42853rd+47
passing downs: success rate0.214132nd0.1632nd-130
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.94393rd2.92885th-8
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15353rd0.1051st-52
short-yardage conversion rate0.76262nd0.72272nd+10
points per trip inside the 405.2866th3.47475th+69
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10116th0.16273rd+57
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0353rd0.07734th+31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066101st0.085123rd+22
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.30044th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.