Fresno State · away
at
Final FRES 0 – 39 USC
Friday 2026-09-04 21:00 · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
USC · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

FRESUSCbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence3687Offence: points per play — defence6114Offence: success rate — offence1197Offence: success rate — defence2034Offence: explosiveness — offence9334Offence: explosiveness — defence7718Run game — offence2439Run game — defence6636Pass game — offence6893Pass game — defence558Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence565Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence3771Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence6195Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence5894

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsFRES by 5USC by 75

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). USC wins about 98% of the time at a number like ours.

FRES

Games4
Plays per game62.2
Drives per game12.0
SP+-0.3 (70th, offence 90th, defence 50th)
Returning production38% (pass 7%, rush 17%, receiving 70%)

USC

Games5
Plays per game72.2
Drives per game9.8
SP+17.8 (13th, offence 3rd, defence 49th)
Returning production59% (pass 91%, rush 78%, receiving 27%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceFRESUSC
pass rate, all downs47%81st50%57th
pass rate, passing downs69%39th78%10th
no-huddle share4%132nd82%43rd
pass rate, standard downs37%109th41%80th
pass rate, 1st down34%117th38%103rd
pass rate, red zone37%73rd41%55th
seconds per play (own drives)31.813th29.851st

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

FRES offence

FRES offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.11524989 of 138
success rate0.369249123 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42824911 of 138
rush: points added per play0.025249105 of 138
rush: success rate0.336249134 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.2262497 of 138
pass: points added per play0.36124945 of 138
pass: success rate0.44524966 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.60624955 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.399249130 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30324979 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.559249131 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.266249136 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.500249133 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.64024985 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13324955 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.108249109 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0242497 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.900249120 of 138

USC offence

USC offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.30736119 of 138
success rate0.5353615 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18736191 of 138
rush: points added per play0.08236185 of 138
rush: success rate0.48636136 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.829361107 of 138
pass: points added per play0.56436110 of 138
pass: success rate0.5923614 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.49736186 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.55836122 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.4673613 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.26836149 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16836172 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.79336143 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.61136131 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0893618 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.04736110 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04236142 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30036194 of 138

FRES defence

FRES defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.01027055 of 138
success rate0.444270110 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.12727033 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.02027047 of 138
rush: success rate0.438270102 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.82127031 of 138
pass: points added per play0.11427063 of 138
pass: success rate0.467270118 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.49427058 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.510270119 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27627063 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.93227087 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.20827086 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.65027042 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.90027042 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15627059 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.10027070 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05627056 of 138
opponent average starting field position77.400270134 of 138

USC defence

USC defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.191294119 of 138
success rate0.42229491 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.363294113 of 138
rush: points added per play0.08029489 of 138
rush: success rate0.40029469 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.96129484 of 138
pass: points added per play0.424294127 of 138
pass: success rate0.462294114 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.724294115 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.44629467 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.374294131 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.58729441 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19329468 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76229494 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.179294119 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1162949 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.07529430 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.04129421 of 138
opponent average starting field position75.300294125 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs