SMU · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Stanford Stadium
Stanford · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces SMU2.7% 11218th2.7% ~0.9 sacks
SMU pass rush11.2% 898th16.0% 1882ndfaces STAN3.3% 15335th7.3% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SMU with the ball

SMU offence vs STAN defenceSMU offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.25140th0.281133rd+93
success rate0.5189th0.458122nd+113
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25059th1.377118th+59
rush: points added per play-0.027121st0.158119th-2
rush: success rate0.47049th0.458112th+63
rush: explosiveness0.646134th1.128124th-10
pass: points added per play0.6037th0.456132nd+125
pass: success rate0.5737th0.466116th+109
pass: explosiveness1.71033rd1.59286th+53
standard downs: success rate0.55821st0.495107th+86
passing downs: success rate0.40515th0.383132nd+117
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.03983rd3.222116th+33
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16462nd0.14519th-43
short-yardage conversion rate0.652109th0.812111th+2
points per trip inside the 403.90371st5.000132nd+61
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12137th0.12820th-17
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07847th0.08036th-11
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04346th0.04940th-6
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.600112th——

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs SMU defenceSTAN offenceSMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th0.02364th-16
success rate0.393112th0.36141st-71
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.317103rd+42
rush: points added per play-0.002114th0.03071st-43
rush: success rate0.398105th0.42689th-16
rush: explosiveness0.796113th1.065109th-4
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.03840th-34
pass: success rate0.386105th0.2997th-98
pass: explosiveness1.60256th1.711112th+56
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.43457th-39
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.20011th-103
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th2.70256th-59
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.21392nd-25
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.3892nd-54
points per trip inside the 403.261109th3.950109th0
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.204122nd+82
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.141124th+81
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.06376th+13
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.