Pittsburgh · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · California Memorial Stadium
California · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CAL pass rush6.1% 9947th6.5% 201117thfaces PITT4.0% 10147th5.0% ~1.7 sacks
PITT pass rush5.6% 10758th11.2% 17924thfaces CAL3.5% 11438th4.6% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

PITT with the ball

PITT offence vs CAL defencePITT offenceCAL defencerank gap
points added per play0.29425th0.01456th+31
success rate0.49726th0.36949th+23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24960th1.341109th+49
rush: points added per play0.07886th0.217129th+43
rush: success rate0.46062nd0.42084th+22
rush: explosiveness0.809111th1.122123rd+12
pass: points added per play0.50716th-0.09213th-3
pass: success rate0.53014th0.32015th+1
pass: explosiveness1.59558th1.644100th+42
standard downs: success rate0.52840th0.43156th+16
passing downs: success rate0.41213th0.25545th+32
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30939th3.160110th+71
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18288th0.14518th-70
short-yardage conversion rate0.632115th0.889130th+15
points per trip inside the 404.23355th2.61525th-30
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09613th0.13127th+14
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05820th0.0635th-15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03827th0.06789th+62
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40073rd——

CAL with the ball

CAL offence vs PITT defenceCAL offencePITT defencerank gap
points added per play0.007120th-0.10718th-102
success rate0.403102nd0.2872nd-100
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19388th1.379119th+31
rush: points added per play-0.056123rd-0.17812th-111
rush: success rate0.376119th0.2787th-112
rush: explosiveness0.763124th0.99592nd-32
pass: points added per play0.13198th-0.01228th-70
pass: success rate0.42977th0.30611th-66
pass: explosiveness1.47492nd1.62093rd+1
standard downs: success rate0.459101st0.3456th-95
passing downs: success rate0.29091st0.20010th-81
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.819108th1.7772nd-106
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.205109th0.320137th+28
short-yardage conversion rate0.667102nd0.53812th-90
points per trip inside the 402.720127th1.6883rd-124
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169107th0.17992nd-15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09483rd0.117104th+21
havoc allowed by the secondary0.076120th0.06375th-45
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70022nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.