Wake Forest · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Gerald J. Ford Stadium
SMU · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SMU pass rush11.2% 898th16.0% 1882ndfaces WAKE6.0% 13486th8.6% ~2.8 sacks
WAKE pass rush6.5% 15443rd10.0% 28941stfaces SMU2.7% 11218th4.6% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WAKE with the ball

WAKE offence vs SMU defenceWAKE offenceSMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.28031st0.02364th+33
success rate0.45258th0.36141st-17
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30536th1.317103rd+67
rush: points added per play0.13966th0.03071st+5
rush: success rate0.46358th0.42689th+31
rush: explosiveness0.851103rd1.065109th+6
pass: points added per play0.40029th0.03840th+11
pass: success rate0.43374th0.2997th-67
pass: explosiveness1.75226th1.711112th+86
standard downs: success rate0.48381st0.43457th-24
passing downs: success rate0.38623rd0.20011th-12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13866th2.70256th-10
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14643rd0.21392nd+49
short-yardage conversion rate0.550129th0.3892nd-127
points per trip inside the 403.73179th3.950109th+30
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12541st0.204122nd+81
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08770th0.141124th+54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03829th0.06376th+47
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.00046th——

SMU with the ball

SMU offence vs WAKE defenceSMU offenceWAKE defencerank gap
points added per play0.25140th0.160110th+70
success rate0.5189th0.468127th+118
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25059th1.05417th-42
rush: points added per play-0.027121st0.04977th-44
rush: success rate0.47049th0.41278th+29
rush: explosiveness0.646134th0.87149th-85
pass: points added per play0.6037th0.25298th+91
pass: success rate0.5737th0.519136th+129
pass: explosiveness1.71033rd1.0982nd-31
standard downs: success rate0.55821st0.511122nd+101
passing downs: success rate0.40515th0.346119th+104
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.03983rd2.86570th-13
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16462nd0.21393rd+31
short-yardage conversion rate0.652109th0.70060th-49
points per trip inside the 403.90371st3.38568th-3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12137th0.12822nd-15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07847th0.09460th+13
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04346th0.0348th-38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.600112th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.