Stanford · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Lane Stadium
Virginia Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
VT pass rush9.5% 9514th13.5% 1719thfaces STAN3.3% 15335th6.4% ~2.1 sacks
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces VT4.8% 12465th3.7% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs VT defenceSTAN offenceVT defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th-0.03038th-42
success rate0.393112th0.33118th-94
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.30999th+38
rush: points added per play-0.002114th-0.14717th-97
rush: success rate0.398105th0.2696th-99
rush: explosiveness0.796113th1.306135th+22
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.14273rd-1
pass: success rate0.386105th0.39170th-35
pass: explosiveness1.60256th1.34019th-37
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.41339th-57
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.20412th-102
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th0.9861st-114
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.403138th+21
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.57118th-38
points per trip inside the 403.261109th2.52219th-90
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.267138th+98
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.220138th+95
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.04735th-28
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

VT with the ball

VT offence vs STAN defenceVT offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.24142nd0.281133rd+91
success rate0.48436th0.458122nd+86
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20582nd1.377118th+36
rush: points added per play0.14960th0.158119th+59
rush: success rate0.50323rd0.458112th+89
rush: explosiveness0.97169th1.128124th+55
pass: points added per play0.35746th0.456132nd+86
pass: success rate0.47151st0.466116th+65
pass: explosiveness1.47591st1.59286th-5
standard downs: success rate0.50457th0.495107th+50
passing downs: success rate0.4279th0.383132nd+123
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99488th3.222116th+28
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.200103rd0.14519th-84
short-yardage conversion rate0.75073rd0.812111th+38
points per trip inside the 404.56735th5.000132nd+97
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11125th0.12820th-5
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08976th0.08036th-40
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0225th0.04940th+35
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400123rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.