Clemson · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 · time TBA · JMA Wireless Dome
Syracuse · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SYR pass rush5.0% 6072nd12.5% 12016thfaces CLEM8.6% 117117th6.8% ~2.2 sacks
CLEM pass rush5.3% 15265th6.3% 284119thfaces SYR5.7% 8881st5.5% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CLEM with the ball

CLEM offence vs SYR defenceCLEM offenceSYR defencerank gap
points added per play-0.027125th-0.12613th-112
success rate0.342132nd0.36142nd-90
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17594th1.08721st-73
rush: points added per play0.09382nd0.02670th-12
rush: success rate0.368120th0.43396th-24
rush: explosiveness1.02049th0.92675th+26
pass: points added per play0.001124th-0.2511st-123
pass: success rate0.328131st0.2895th-126
pass: explosiveness1.400114th1.37724th-90
standard downs: success rate0.405129th0.45274th-55
passing downs: success rate0.228125th0.20613th-112
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.764114th2.62949th-65
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211114th0.233111th-3
short-yardage conversion rate0.80035th0.75087th+52
points per trip inside the 403.095117th2.75031st-86
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.188127th0.186107th-20
havoc allowed by the front seven0.146136th0.137121st-15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04239th0.04941st+2
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40071st——

SYR with the ball

SYR offence vs CLEM defenceSYR offenceCLEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.038113th0.01758th-55
success rate0.399109th0.41083rd-26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.33027th1.18854th+27
rush: points added per play0.14364th0.203127th+63
rush: success rate0.45069th0.492132nd+63
rush: explosiveness0.99657th0.88759th+2
pass: points added per play0.043115th-0.05519th-96
pass: success rate0.372115th0.34424th-91
pass: explosiveness1.71232nd1.56373rd+41
standard downs: success rate0.443113th0.43055th-58
passing downs: success rate0.31272nd0.368128th+56
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.851102nd3.459135th+33
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.220121st0.12912th-109
short-yardage conversion rate0.80040th0.72774th+34
points per trip inside the 403.53892nd2.34616th-76
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12643rd0.16067th+24
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08460th0.07322nd-38
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04240th0.087125th+85
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.200119th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.