Pittsburgh · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Hard Rock Stadium
Miami · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
MIA pass rush5.8% 12152nd8.0% 17687thfaces PITT4.0% 10147th4.9% ~1.6 sacks
PITT pass rush5.6% 10758th11.2% 17924thfaces MIA2.9% 10525th4.2% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

PITT with the ball

PITT offence vs MIA defencePITT offenceMIA defencerank gap
points added per play0.29425th-0.04931st+6
success rate0.49726th0.32514th-12
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24960th1.14942nd-18
rush: points added per play0.07886th-0.15814th-72
rush: success rate0.46062nd0.2571st-61
rush: explosiveness0.809111th0.71916th-95
pass: points added per play0.50716th0.02435th+19
pass: success rate0.53014th0.36235th+21
pass: explosiveness1.59558th1.30314th-44
standard downs: success rate0.52840th0.37917th-23
passing downs: success rate0.41213th0.22928th+15
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30939th2.1537th-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18288th0.270130th+42
short-yardage conversion rate0.632115th0.57116th-99
points per trip inside the 404.23355th2.30815th-40
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09613th0.16271st+58
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05820th0.09664th+44
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03827th0.06687th+60
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40073rd——

MIA with the ball

MIA offence vs PITT defenceMIA offencePITT defencerank gap
points added per play0.4422nd-0.10718th+16
success rate0.5713rd0.2872nd-1
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.27850th1.379119th+69
rush: points added per play0.12372nd-0.17812th-60
rush: success rate0.51121st0.2787th-14
rush: explosiveness0.98263rd0.99592nd+29
pass: points added per play0.8391st-0.01228th+27
pass: success rate0.6541st0.30611th+10
pass: explosiveness1.48988th1.62093rd+5
standard downs: success rate0.6302nd0.3456th+4
passing downs: success rate0.37529th0.20010th-19
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.8874th1.7772nd-2
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12115th0.320137th+122
short-yardage conversion rate0.81231st0.53812th-19
points per trip inside the 405.05714th1.6883rd-11
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0684th0.17992nd+88
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0469th0.117104th+95
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0213rd0.06375th+72
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.00079th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.