California · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Gerald J. Ford Stadium
SMU · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SMU pass rush11.2% 898th16.0% 1882ndfaces CAL3.5% 11438th7.4% ~2.4 sacks
CAL pass rush6.1% 9947th6.5% 201117thfaces SMU2.7% 11218th4.4% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CAL with the ball

CAL offence vs SMU defenceCAL offenceSMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.007120th0.02364th-56
success rate0.403102nd0.36141st-61
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19388th1.317103rd+15
rush: points added per play-0.056123rd0.03071st-52
rush: success rate0.376119th0.42689th-30
rush: explosiveness0.763124th1.065109th-15
pass: points added per play0.13198th0.03840th-58
pass: success rate0.42977th0.2997th-70
pass: explosiveness1.47492nd1.711112th+20
standard downs: success rate0.459101st0.43457th-44
passing downs: success rate0.29091st0.20011th-80
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.819108th2.70256th-52
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.205109th0.21392nd-17
short-yardage conversion rate0.667102nd0.3892nd-100
points per trip inside the 402.720127th3.950109th-18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169107th0.204122nd+15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09483rd0.141124th+41
havoc allowed by the secondary0.076120th0.06376th-44
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70022nd——

SMU with the ball

SMU offence vs CAL defenceSMU offenceCAL defencerank gap
points added per play0.25140th0.01456th+16
success rate0.5189th0.36949th+40
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25059th1.341109th+50
rush: points added per play-0.027121st0.217129th+8
rush: success rate0.47049th0.42084th+35
rush: explosiveness0.646134th1.122123rd-11
pass: points added per play0.6037th-0.09213th+6
pass: success rate0.5737th0.32015th+8
pass: explosiveness1.71033rd1.644100th+67
standard downs: success rate0.55821st0.43156th+35
passing downs: success rate0.40515th0.25545th+30
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.03983rd3.160110th+27
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16462nd0.14518th-44
short-yardage conversion rate0.652109th0.889130th+21
points per trip inside the 403.90371st2.61525th-46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12137th0.13127th-10
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07847th0.0635th-42
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04346th0.06789th+43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.600112th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.