Pittsburgh · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Alumni Stadium (Chestnut Hill, MA)
Boston College · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BC pass rush7.2% 8333rd10.8% 20428thfaces PITT4.0% 10147th5.6% ~1.8 sacks
PITT pass rush5.6% 10758th11.2% 17924thfaces BC7.5% 93104th6.6% ~2.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

PITT with the ball

PITT offence vs BC defencePITT offenceBC defencerank gap
points added per play0.29425th0.00251st+26
success rate0.49726th0.39571st+45
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24960th1.23775th+15
rush: points added per play0.07886th0.00761st-25
rush: success rate0.46062nd0.39059th-3
rush: explosiveness0.809111th1.030101st-10
pass: points added per play0.50716th0.15576th+60
pass: success rate0.53014th0.42292nd+78
pass: explosiveness1.59558th1.49256th-2
standard downs: success rate0.52840th0.39827th-13
passing downs: success rate0.41213th0.388133rd+120
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.30939th3.01696th+57
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18288th0.19572nd-16
short-yardage conversion rate0.632115th0.65041st-74
points per trip inside the 404.23355th3.39169th+14
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09613th0.17483rd+70
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05820th0.120107th+87
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03827th0.05448th+21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.40073rd——

BC with the ball

BC offence vs PITT defenceBC offencePITT defencerank gap
points added per play-0.032127th-0.10718th-109
success rate0.389115th0.2872nd-113
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.164101st1.379119th+18
rush: points added per play-0.006115th-0.17812th-103
rush: success rate0.43981st0.2787th-74
rush: explosiveness0.93579th0.99592nd+13
pass: points added per play0.063110th-0.01228th-82
pass: success rate0.357126th0.30611th-115
pass: explosiveness1.53374th1.62093rd+19
standard downs: success rate0.46099th0.3456th-93
passing downs: success rate0.244116th0.20010th-106
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.847103rd1.7772nd-101
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252134th0.320137th+3
short-yardage conversion rate0.68898th0.53812th-86
points per trip inside the 403.091118th1.6883rd-115
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.179120th0.17992nd-28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111112th0.117104th-8
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069107th0.06375th-32
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20058th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.