The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
GT
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 65.0 |
| Drives per game | 10.5 |
| SP+ | -0.1 (69th, offence 66th, defence 76th) |
| Returning production | 13% (pass 0%, rush 35%, receiving 11%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | GT |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 53%34th |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 44%47th |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 42%78th |
| no-huddle share | — | 33%98th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 71%33rd |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 48%26th |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 28.875th |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
GT offence
| GT offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.141 | 260 | 76 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.442 | 260 | 68 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.221 | 260 | 71 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.112 | 260 | 73 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.452 | 260 | 67 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.885 | 260 | 87 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.191 | 260 | 84 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.443 | 260 | 68 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.513 | 260 | 78 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.500 | 260 | 60 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.312 | 260 | 71 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.074 | 260 | 76 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.202 | 260 | 106 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.706 | 260 | 93 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.393 | 260 | 101 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.162 | 260 | 95 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.104 | 260 | 105 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.058 | 260 | 77 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.600 | 260 | 66 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
GT defence
| GT defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.155 | 281 | 105 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.413 | 281 | 85 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.267 | 281 | 87 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.082 | 281 | 91 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.447 | 281 | 107 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.865 | 281 | 45 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.343 | 281 | 121 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.366 | 281 | 41 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 2.089 | 281 | 138 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.447 | 281 | 68 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.341 | 281 | 115 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.906 | 281 | 80 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.171 | 281 | 38 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.684 | 281 | 54 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.654 | 281 | 91 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.160 | 281 | 68 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.121 | 281 | 110 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.039 | 281 | 15 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 70.400 | 281 | 40 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs