Miami · away
at
Final MIA 45 – 6 STAN
Friday 2026-09-04 21:00 · Stanford Stadium
Stanford · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces MIA2.9% 10525th2.8% ~0.9 sacks
MIA pass rush5.8% 12152nd8.0% 17687thfaces STAN3.3% 15335th4.5% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MIA with the ball

MIA offence vs STAN defenceMIA offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.4422nd0.281133rd+131
success rate0.5713rd0.458122nd+119
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.27850th1.377118th+68
rush: points added per play0.12372nd0.158119th+47
rush: success rate0.51121st0.458112th+91
rush: explosiveness0.98263rd1.128124th+61
pass: points added per play0.8391st0.456132nd+131
pass: success rate0.6541st0.466116th+115
pass: explosiveness1.48988th1.59286th-2
standard downs: success rate0.6302nd0.495107th+105
passing downs: success rate0.37529th0.383132nd+103
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.8874th3.222116th+112
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12115th0.14519th+4
short-yardage conversion rate0.81231st0.812111th+80
points per trip inside the 405.05714th5.000132nd+118
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0684th0.12820th+16
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0469th0.08036th+27
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0213rd0.04940th+37
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.00079th——

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs MIA defenceSTAN offenceMIA defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th-0.04931st-49
success rate0.393112th0.32514th-98
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.14942nd-19
rush: points added per play-0.002114th-0.15814th-100
rush: success rate0.398105th0.2571st-104
rush: explosiveness0.796113th0.71916th-97
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.02435th-39
pass: success rate0.386105th0.36235th-70
pass: explosiveness1.60256th1.30314th-42
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.37917th-79
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.22928th-86
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th2.1537th-108
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.270130th+13
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.57116th-40
points per trip inside the 403.261109th2.30815th-94
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.16271st+31
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.09664th+21
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.06687th+24
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.