Alabama · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · FirstBank Stadium
Vanderbilt · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
VAN pass rush6.9% 10240th9.0% 19960thfaces ALA5.9% 11885th6.4% ~2.1 sacks
ALA pass rush8.5% 11822nd9.9% 23345thfaces VAN5.7% 10583rd7.1% ~2.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ALA with the ball

ALA offence vs VAN defenceALA offenceVAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.32716th-0.03934th+18
success rate0.49429th0.35030th+1
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.33226th1.336107th+81
rush: points added per play0.23728th-0.01949th+21
rush: success rate0.50024th0.38355th+31
rush: explosiveness1.10721st1.02297th+76
pass: points added per play0.47020th0.01132nd+12
pass: success rate0.49134th0.33620th-14
pass: explosiveness1.62852nd1.671104th+52
standard downs: success rate0.54133rd0.42148th+15
passing downs: success rate0.37033rd0.24535th+2
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99389th2.53934th-55
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.209111th0.20078th-33
short-yardage conversion rate0.77849th0.789105th+56
points per trip inside the 405.3574th2.90543rd+39
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15484th0.185106th+22
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09790th0.11091st+1
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05675th0.075104th+29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400122nd——

VAN with the ball

VAN offence vs ALA defenceVAN offenceALA defencerank gap
points added per play0.082101st-0.09820th-81
success rate0.41598th0.34123rd-75
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18093rd1.382122nd+29
rush: points added per play0.16152nd-0.17413th-39
rush: success rate0.42193rd0.31115th-78
rush: explosiveness1.05834th0.91369th+35
pass: points added per play0.20281st-0.01827th-54
pass: success rate0.44964th0.35832nd-32
pass: explosiveness1.301127th1.826124th-3
standard downs: success rate0.47985th0.39124th-61
passing downs: success rate0.263110th0.25040th-70
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05081st2.1988th-73
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15048th0.244116th+68
short-yardage conversion rate0.77355th0.56214th-41
points per trip inside the 403.120116th3.824101st-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12948th0.189111th+63
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08566th0.10887th+21
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04449th0.080114th+65
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80084th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.