Tennessee · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Kyle Field
Texas A&M · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

TENNTA&Mbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence6320Offence: points per play — defence8551Offence: success rate — offence6152Offence: success rate — defence7255Offence: explosiveness — offence445Offence: explosiveness — defence8829Run game — offence9242Run game — defence3577Pass game — offence3514Pass game — defence9634Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence8959Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence2858Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence4733Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence737

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsTENN by 29TA&M by 51

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). TA&M wins about 76% of the time at a number like ours.

TENN

Games4
Plays per game71.8
Drives per game11.8
SP+17.7 (14th, offence 14th, defence 26th)
Returning production35% (pass 7%, rush 48%, receiving 52%)

TA&M

Games4
Plays per game74.5
Drives per game12.2
SP+8.9 (39th, offence 38th, defence 44th)
Returning production73% (pass 97%, rush 68%, receiving 61%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceTENNTA&M
pass rate, all downs42%114th51%49th
pass rate, standard downs41%79th42%60th
pass rate, 1st down41%88th38%104th
no-huddle share83%40th88%25th
pass rate, passing downs45%134th71%34th
pass rate, red zone31%103rd35%85th
seconds per play (own drives)27.495th29.266th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

TENN offence

TENN offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.22428752 of 138
success rate0.45628754 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20828778 of 138
rush: points added per play0.31128712 of 138
rush: success rate0.48528737 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.11328720 of 138
pass: points added per play0.17228790 of 138
pass: success rate0.43128776 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.361287119 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.51728745 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30028784 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.54028716 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13828736 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.83328724 of 138
points per trip inside the 405.3082875 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14328773 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.101287101 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04228741 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60028767 of 138

TA&M offence

TA&M offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.043298111 of 138
success rate0.44329867 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.074298131 of 138
rush: points added per play0.09429881 of 138
rush: success rate0.49729828 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.820298110 of 138
pass: points added per play0.022298119 of 138
pass: success rate0.385298107 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.405298112 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47829886 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.36629834 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21629857 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16629865 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.85029815 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.36029843 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16129893 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07729846 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084298130 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400298116 of 138

TENN defence

TENN defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.08625722 of 138
success rate0.35825739 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.06425718 of 138
rush: points added per play0.08125790 of 138
rush: success rate0.36525742 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.02625799 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.1442576 of 138
pass: success rate0.37925755 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.0952571 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.40625734 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27225758 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.03125799 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19125764 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.75025788 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.22725711 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.218257129 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.148257129 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.07025797 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.20025773 of 138

TA&M defence

TA&M defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.03322668 of 138
success rate0.38522662 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30722698 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.07922632 of 138
rush: success rate0.36622644 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.84122636 of 138
pass: points added per play0.21822692 of 138
pass: success rate0.40822677 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.851226130 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42622651 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28122670 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.76422659 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17922645 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.71422669 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.05322654 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17722687 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.115226100 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06222671 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.90022645 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs