The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UGA pass rush | 5.2% 11667th | 8.6% 19774th | faces MIZ | 2.2% 9214th | 3.7% ~1.2 sacks |
| MIZ pass rush | 7.3% 10931st | 9.5% 21151st | faces UGA | 5.3% 7673rd | 6.3% ~2.1 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
MIZ with the ball
| MIZ offence vs UGA defence | MIZ offence | UGA defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.19960th | -0.14310th | -50 |
| success rate | 0.43675th | 0.33117th | -58 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.23864th | 1.09224th | -40 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.04298th | -0.4201st | -97 |
| rush: success rate | 0.400104th | 0.2674th | -100 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.768121st | 0.4965th | -116 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.45923rd | 0.06749th | +26 |
| pass: success rate | 0.47249th | 0.37952nd | +3 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.67238th | 1.43438th | 0 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.48479th | 0.42249th | -30 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.33057th | 0.1906th | -51 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.09971st | 2.0304th | -67 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.17276th | 0.21696th | +20 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.69296th | 0.54513th | -83 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.72280th | 3.00047th | -33 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.168106th | 0.188108th | +2 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.08668th | 0.124112th | +44 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.082128th | 0.06479th | -49 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 61.500137th | — | — |
UGA with the ball
| UGA offence vs MIZ defence | UGA offence | MIZ defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.4254th | -0.00448th | +44 |
| success rate | 0.5336th | 0.35436th | +30 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.30139th | 1.412126th | +87 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.3289th | -0.00258th | +49 |
| rush: success rate | 0.51618th | 0.36341st | +23 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.06828th | 1.074111th | +83 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.5679th | 0.07153rd | +44 |
| pass: success rate | 0.55612th | 0.35127th | +15 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.54172nd | 1.696109th | +37 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.6015th | 0.40030th | +25 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.32265th | 0.28373rd | +8 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.69110th | 2.48128th | +18 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.11914th | 0.244117th | +103 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.8829th | 0.867126th | +117 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 5.8211st | 3.26362nd | +61 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.12036th | 0.221130th | +94 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07441st | 0.133118th | +77 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04550th | 0.089126th | +76 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 65.000130th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.