Cincinnati · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · LaVell Edwards Stadium
BYU · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BYU pass rush4.0% 7591st9.4% 12754thfaces CIN5.3% 7671st4.6% ~1.5 sacks
CIN pass rush3.5% 11698th8.0% 20185thfaces BYU2.3% 4415th2.9% ~0.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CIN with the ball

CIN offence vs BYU defenceCIN offenceBYU defencerank gap
points added per play0.36311th-0.06128th+17
success rate0.49627th0.36948th+21
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30535th1.18252nd+17
rush: points added per play0.3614th-0.06934th+30
rush: success rate0.49726th0.35536th+10
rush: explosiveness1.2248th0.89462nd+54
pass: points added per play0.38534th0.02434th0
pass: success rate0.50926th0.39066th+40
pass: explosiveness1.432105th1.38327th-78
standard downs: success rate0.56017th0.38720th+3
passing downs: success rate0.33853rd0.333113th+60
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.67711th2.41125th+14
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13226th0.224106th+80
short-yardage conversion rate0.83322nd0.76995th+73
points per trip inside the 405.2008th3.75097th+89
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10720th0.17180th+60
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09688th0.09157th-31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0112nd0.080115th+113
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.20095th——

BYU with the ball

BYU offence vs CIN defenceBYU offenceCIN defencerank gap
points added per play0.4481st0.10288th+87
success rate0.5991st0.41587th+86
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.157103rd1.20560th-43
rush: points added per play0.4791st0.113102nd+101
rush: success rate0.6171st0.482129th+128
rush: explosiveness1.05335th0.82833rd-2
pass: points added per play0.38037th0.22093rd+56
pass: success rate0.5679th0.37851st+42
pass: explosiveness1.317125th1.56575th-50
standard downs: success rate0.6641st0.46280th+79
passing downs: success rate0.34249th0.318105th+56
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9522nd3.217115th+113
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12218th0.17944th+26
short-yardage conversion rate0.9414th0.66745th+41
points per trip inside the 405.4353rd3.947108th+105
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0592nd0.16374th+72
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0161st0.10784th+83
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04344th0.05654th+10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400102nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.