Utah · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Arizona Stadium
Arizona · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ARIZ pass rush4.4% 11482nd8.8% 19268thfaces UTAH3.2% 9529th3.8% ~1.2 sacks
UTAH pass rush7.1% 12736th10.3% 20436thfaces ARIZ8.8% 113120th8.0% ~2.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTAH with the ball

UTAH offence vs ARIZ defenceUTAH offenceARIZ defencerank gap
points added per play0.32815th0.00250th+35
success rate0.50719th0.35231st+12
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32130th1.415127th+97
rush: points added per play0.28517th0.01865th+48
rush: success rate0.49032nd0.34733rd+1
rush: explosiveness1.16711th1.072110th+99
pass: points added per play0.39731st0.05346th+15
pass: success rate0.52915th0.35630th+15
pass: explosiveness1.51777th1.60191st+14
standard downs: success rate0.53437th0.40332nd-5
passing downs: success rate0.42410th0.27764th+54
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.47923rd2.58942nd+19
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19597th0.253125th+28
short-yardage conversion rate0.73976th1.000137th+61
points per trip inside the 404.96916th2.82435th+19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12846th0.16878th+32
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08874th0.10888th+14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04035th0.06064th+29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.500127th——

ARIZ with the ball

ARIZ offence vs UTAH defenceARIZ offenceUTAH defencerank gap
points added per play0.21356th-0.07424th-32
success rate0.50022nd0.31911th-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151106th1.337108th+2
rush: points added per play0.14762nd-0.09230th-32
rush: success rate0.52114th0.32423rd+9
rush: explosiveness0.696132nd0.94479th-53
pass: points added per play0.28161st-0.08314th-47
pass: success rate0.49333rd0.31013th-20
pass: explosiveness1.51080th1.60692nd+12
standard downs: success rate0.53635th0.3405th-30
passing downs: success rate0.41911th0.29182nd+71
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.53417th2.63250th+33
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11812th0.20482nd+70
short-yardage conversion rate0.85014th0.50010th-4
points per trip inside the 404.32146th2.27812th-34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11430th0.204123rd+93
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07544th0.08546th+2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03930th0.119138th+108
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20056th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.