TCU · away
at
—
Friday 2026-11-06 22:15 · Arizona Stadium
Arizona · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ARIZ pass rush4.4% 11482nd8.8% 19268thfaces TCU6.7% 10593rd5.5% ~1.8 sacks
TCU pass rush7.8% 7724th6.8% 161111thfaces ARIZ8.8% 113120th8.3% ~2.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TCU with the ball

TCU offence vs ARIZ defenceTCU offenceARIZ defencerank gap
points added per play0.17464th0.00250th-14
success rate0.46251st0.35231st-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24062nd1.415127th+65
rush: points added per play0.030104th0.01865th-39
rush: success rate0.47051st0.34733rd-18
rush: explosiveness0.771120th1.072110th-10
pass: points added per play0.31953rd0.05346th-7
pass: success rate0.46452nd0.35630th-22
pass: explosiveness1.66441st1.60191st+50
standard downs: success rate0.5739th0.40332nd+23
passing downs: success rate0.218130th0.27764th-66
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.03084th2.58942nd-42
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16463rd0.253125th+62
short-yardage conversion rate0.84219th1.000137th+118
points per trip inside the 403.43399th2.82435th-64
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13359th0.16878th+19
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104106th0.10888th-18
havoc allowed by the secondary0.02912th0.06064th+52
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.500113th——

ARIZ with the ball

ARIZ offence vs TCU defenceARIZ offenceTCU defencerank gap
points added per play0.21356th-0.12114th-42
success rate0.50022nd0.36847th+25
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151106th0.9251st-105
rush: points added per play0.14762nd-0.2863rd-59
rush: success rate0.52114th0.31617th+3
rush: explosiveness0.696132nd0.4614th-128
pass: points added per play0.28161st0.07254th-7
pass: success rate0.49333rd0.41785th+52
pass: explosiveness1.51080th1.35921st-59
standard downs: success rate0.53635th0.40835th0
passing downs: success rate0.41911th0.28272nd+61
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.53417th2.54435th+18
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11812th0.21190th+78
short-yardage conversion rate0.85014th0.56215th+1
points per trip inside the 404.32146th3.00049th+3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11430th0.17994th+64
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07544th0.117105th+61
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03930th0.06377th+47
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20056th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.