Utah · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Folsom Field
Colorado · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
COLO pass rush5.6% 8957th15.7% 1983rdfaces UTAH3.2% 9529th4.4% ~1.4 sacks
UTAH pass rush7.1% 12736th10.3% 20436thfaces COLO6.6% 10690th6.8% ~2.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTAH with the ball

UTAH offence vs COLO defenceUTAH offenceCOLO defencerank gap
points added per play0.32815th0.00754th+39
success rate0.50719th0.38261st+42
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32130th1.20762nd+32
rush: points added per play0.28517th-0.13520th+3
rush: success rate0.49032nd0.41075th+43
rush: explosiveness1.16711th0.67512th+1
pass: points added per play0.39731st0.22594th+63
pass: success rate0.52915th0.36539th+24
pass: explosiveness1.51777th1.830127th+50
standard downs: success rate0.53437th0.41542nd+5
passing downs: success rate0.42410th0.320107th+97
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.47923rd2.37023rd0
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19597th0.317136th+39
short-yardage conversion rate0.73976th0.64739th-37
points per trip inside the 404.96916th2.93544th+28
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12846th0.201118th+72
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08874th0.138123rd+49
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04035th0.06478th+43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.500127th——

COLO with the ball

COLO offence vs UTAH defenceCOLO offenceUTAH defencerank gap
points added per play0.059104th-0.07424th-80
success rate0.398110th0.31911th-99
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20285th1.337108th+23
rush: points added per play-0.019119th-0.09230th-89
rush: success rate0.404101st0.32423rd-78
rush: explosiveness0.852100th0.94479th-21
pass: points added per play0.113106th-0.08314th-92
pass: success rate0.386104th0.31013th-91
pass: explosiveness1.60654th1.60692nd+38
standard downs: success rate0.439119th0.3405th-114
passing downs: success rate0.31270th0.29182nd+12
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13368th2.63250th-18
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14441st0.20482nd+41
short-yardage conversion rate0.619117th0.50010th-107
points per trip inside the 402.217134th2.27812th-122
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.184126th0.204123rd-3
havoc allowed by the front seven0.122127th0.08546th-81
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06185th0.119138th+53
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10014th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.