Kansas · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 22:15 · Rice-Eccles Stadium
Utah · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTAH pass rush7.1% 12736th10.3% 20436thfaces KU5.9% 6884th6.5% ~2.1 sacks
KU pass rush1.8% 54126th9.0% 13361stfaces UTAH3.2% 9529th2.5% ~0.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

KU with the ball

KU offence vs UTAH defenceKU offenceUTAH defencerank gap
points added per play0.20259th-0.07424th-35
success rate0.44170th0.31911th-59
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42910th1.337108th+98
rush: points added per play0.09780th-0.09230th-50
rush: success rate0.44672nd0.32423rd-49
rush: explosiveness0.94476th0.94479th+3
pass: points added per play0.28460th-0.08314th-46
pass: success rate0.41390th0.31013th-77
pass: explosiveness2.0423rd1.60692nd+89
standard downs: success rate0.50456th0.3405th-51
passing downs: success rate0.32958th0.29182nd+24
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.26947th2.63250th+3
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0996th0.20482nd+76
short-yardage conversion rate0.545130th0.50010th-120
points per trip inside the 403.167115th2.27812th-103
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.173115th0.204123rd+8
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10096th0.08546th-50
havoc allowed by the secondary0.073114th0.119138th+24
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.10030th——

UTAH with the ball

UTAH offence vs KU defenceUTAH offenceKU defencerank gap
points added per play0.32815th-0.06826th+11
success rate0.50719th0.3088th-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32130th1.23573rd+43
rush: points added per play0.28517th-0.15715th-2
rush: success rate0.49032nd0.2685th-27
rush: explosiveness1.16711th0.76525th+14
pass: points added per play0.39731st0.275105th+74
pass: success rate0.52915th0.37750th+35
pass: explosiveness1.51777th1.718113th+36
standard downs: success rate0.53437th0.36410th-27
passing downs: success rate0.42410th0.22119th+9
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.47923rd2.1326th-17
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19597th0.250122nd+25
short-yardage conversion rate0.73976th0.75084th+8
points per trip inside the 404.96916th3.23860th+44
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12846th0.200117th+71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08874th0.144127th+53
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04035th0.05657th+22
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.500127th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.