UCF · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-10 12:00 · Boone Pickens Stadium
Oklahoma State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
OKST pass rush9.6% 8313th8.8% 20470thfaces UCF4.2% 7153rd6.9% ~2.3 sacks
UCF pass rush5.7% 12354th10.1% 21940thfaces OKST0.8% 1204th3.3% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UCF with the ball

UCF offence vs OKST defenceUCF offenceOKST defencerank gap
points added per play0.11985th-0.03037th-48
success rate0.43676th0.37356th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20681st1.15844th-37
rush: points added per play0.18046th0.04073rd+27
rush: success rate0.44574th0.42485th+11
rush: explosiveness1.16512th0.92777th+65
pass: points added per play0.053113th-0.1368th-105
pass: success rate0.42679th0.3019th-70
pass: explosiveness1.278130th1.63996th-34
standard downs: success rate0.49467th0.45678th+11
passing downs: success rate0.29987th0.1988th-79
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05280th3.082105th+25
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17278th0.16734th-44
short-yardage conversion rate0.80041st0.61128th-13
points per trip inside the 404.76921st3.00048th+27
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13765th0.16375th+10
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09792nd0.08344th-48
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04034th0.079113th+79
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.200136th——

OKST with the ball

OKST offence vs UCF defenceOKST offenceUCF defencerank gap
points added per play0.16168th-0.04732nd-36
success rate0.49131st0.34325th-6
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.108125th1.27591st-34
rush: points added per play0.07187th-0.11923rd-64
rush: success rate0.47248th0.30714th-34
rush: explosiveness0.731127th0.87250th-77
pass: points added per play0.33350th0.07756th+6
pass: success rate0.52419th0.38560th+41
pass: explosiveness1.50382nd1.59587th+5
standard downs: success rate0.55325th0.40031st+6
passing downs: success rate0.31368th0.24839th-29
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.22655th2.29113th-42
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17277th0.241114th+37
short-yardage conversion rate0.640113th0.62534th-79
points per trip inside the 403.75078th2.30414th-64
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09111th0.17382nd+71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0445th0.11192nd+87
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04755th0.06273rd+18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.60049th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.