BYU · away
at
Final BYU 41 – 23 CSU
Saturday 2026-09-19 19:30 · Canvas Stadium
Colorado State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

BYUCSUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence10077Offence: points per play — defence8019Offence: success rate — offence10048Offence: success rate — defence6610Offence: explosiveness — offence2698Offence: explosiveness — defence6360Run game — offence10090Run game — defence766Pass game — offence7461Pass game — defence7626Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence999Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence827Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence9937Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence4231

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsBYU by 62CSU by 18

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). BYU wins about 91% of the time at a number like ours.

BYU

Games3
Plays per game62.3
Drives per game11.3
SP+16.3 (17th, offence 24th, defence 21st)
Returning production79% (pass 100%, rush 97%, receiving 51%)

CSU

Games4
Plays per game70.8
Drives per game12.2
SP+-7.3 (97th, offence 70th, defence 116th)
Returning production40% (pass 23%, rush -28%, receiving 58%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceBYUCSU
pass rate, all downs37%129th58%11th
pass rate, standard downs33%122nd51%10th
pass rate, 1st down34%115th49%25th
no-huddle share2%138th80%46th
pass rate, passing downs53%121st73%25th
pass rate, red zone29%113th42%52nd
seconds per play (own drives)32.411th26.2119th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

BYU offence

BYU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.4481871 of 138
success rate0.5991871 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.157187103 of 138
rush: points added per play0.4791871 of 138
rush: success rate0.6171871 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.05318735 of 138
pass: points added per play0.38018737 of 138
pass: success rate0.5671879 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.317187125 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.6641871 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.34218749 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.9521872 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12218718 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.9411874 of 138
points per trip inside the 405.4351873 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0591872 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.0161871 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04318744 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.400187102 of 138

CSU offence

CSU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.27028333 of 138
success rate0.43828372 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5122834 of 138
rush: points added per play0.28728315 of 138
rush: success rate0.42928387 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.3442832 of 138
pass: points added per play0.30928354 of 138
pass: success rate0.44928361 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.66328342 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47228393 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.35728342 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.616283125 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202283105 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.80028336 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.87528319 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15528387 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08128353 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.074283115 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.600283101 of 138

BYU defence

BYU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.06118728 of 138
success rate0.36918748 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18218752 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.06918734 of 138
rush: success rate0.35518736 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.89418762 of 138
pass: points added per play0.02418734 of 138
pass: success rate0.39018766 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.38318727 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.38718720 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.333187113 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.41118725 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.224187106 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76918795 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.75018797 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17118780 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.09118757 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.080187115 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.80018790 of 138

CSU defence

CSU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.163253112 of 138
success rate0.462253124 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19825356 of 138
rush: points added per play0.229253130 of 138
rush: success rate0.487253130 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.92725376 of 138
pass: points added per play0.273253103 of 138
pass: success rate0.467253117 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.664253103 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.522253127 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.31025396 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.395253129 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.15825329 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.889253131 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.037253114 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.18225395 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.10725385 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.075253102 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.50025357 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs