Tulane · away
at
Final TULN 20 – 31 KSU
Saturday 2026-09-19 12:00 · Bill Snyder Family Stadium
Kansas State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
KSU pass rush15.7% 701st17.2% 1571stfaces TULN8.6% 116118th12.2% ~4.0 sacks
TULN pass rush4.1% 12289th7.3% 275100thfaces KSU0.0% 1112nd2.1% ~0.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TULN with the ball

TULN offence vs KSU defenceTULN offenceKSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.10392nd-0.03933rd-59
success rate0.343131st0.3057th-124
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5133rd1.495135th+132
rush: points added per play0.16151st0.07185th+34
rush: success rate0.379118th0.34132nd-86
rush: explosiveness1.3461st1.443138th+137
pass: points added per play0.020120th-0.11910th-110
pass: success rate0.304134th0.2581st-133
pass: explosiveness1.70334th1.64398th+64
standard downs: success rate0.408128th0.3333rd-125
passing downs: success rate0.237122nd0.26656th-66
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.573129th2.51132nd-97
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.218120th0.256126th+6
short-yardage conversion rate0.75072nd0.4175th-67
points per trip inside the 402.474132nd3.857103rd-29
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.200133rd0.238134th+1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.135133rd0.193137th+4
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06598th0.04530th-68
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.1006th——

KSU with the ball

KSU offence vs TULN defenceKSU offenceTULN defencerank gap
points added per play0.30718th0.171115th+97
success rate0.51415th0.39672nd+57
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21574th1.30697th+23
rush: points added per play0.32011th0.112101st+90
rush: success rate0.5606th0.37048th+42
rush: explosiveness1.01652nd1.074112th+60
pass: points added per play0.30556th0.300110th+54
pass: success rate0.47150th0.443107th+57
pass: explosiveness1.48489th1.54669th-20
standard downs: success rate0.54928th0.44162nd+34
passing downs: success rate0.4337th0.317104th+97
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.39829th3.086106th+77
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13330th0.16233rd+3
short-yardage conversion rate0.76260th0.76997th+37
points per trip inside the 404.96317th3.30865th+48
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.0845th0.1106th+1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05717th0.06711th-6
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0278th0.04224th+16
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.10076th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.