The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
TCU
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 69.8 |
| Drives per game | 11.2 |
| SP+ | 8.2 (42nd, offence 58th, defence 28th) |
| Returning production | 22% (pass 11%, rush 31%, receiving 29%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | TCU |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 52%41st |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 47%33rd |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 46%43rd |
| no-huddle share | — | 97%10th |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 34%88th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 63%72nd |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 30.924th |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
TCU offence
| TCU offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.174 | 279 | 64 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.462 | 279 | 51 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.240 | 279 | 62 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.030 | 279 | 104 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.470 | 279 | 51 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.771 | 279 | 120 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.319 | 279 | 53 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.464 | 279 | 52 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.664 | 279 | 41 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.573 | 279 | 9 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.218 | 279 | 130 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.030 | 279 | 84 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.164 | 279 | 63 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.842 | 279 | 19 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.433 | 279 | 99 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.133 | 279 | 59 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.104 | 279 | 106 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.029 | 279 | 12 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 67.500 | 279 | 113 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
TCU defence
| TCU defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.121 | 223 | 14 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.368 | 223 | 47 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 0.925 | 223 | 1 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | -0.286 | 223 | 3 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.316 | 223 | 17 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.461 | 223 | 4 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.072 | 223 | 54 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.417 | 223 | 85 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.359 | 223 | 21 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.408 | 223 | 35 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.282 | 223 | 72 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.544 | 223 | 35 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.211 | 223 | 90 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.562 | 223 | 15 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.000 | 223 | 49 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.179 | 223 | 94 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.117 | 223 | 105 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.063 | 223 | 77 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 72.600 | 223 | 84 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs