Coastal Carolina · away
at
Final CCU 24 – 31 WVU
Saturday 2026-09-05 12:00 · Milan Puskar Stadium
West Virginia · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

CCUWVUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence5055Offence: points per play — defence4031Offence: success rate — offence2857Offence: success rate — defence1522Offence: explosiveness — offence9440Offence: explosiveness — defence9964Run game — offence4558Run game — defence5967Pass game — offence5061Pass game — defence715Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence8164Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence1944Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence682Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence6761

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsCCU by 22WVU by 58

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). WVU wins about 87% of the time at a number like ours.

CCU

Games4
Plays per game65.5
Drives per game12.0
SP+-11.4 (112th, offence 96th, defence 119th)
Returning production15% (pass 12%, rush 16%, receiving 17%)

WVU

Games4
Plays per game74.0
Drives per game12.5
SP+1.4 (64th, offence 43rd, defence 92nd)
Returning production14% (pass 62%, rush -4%, receiving 9%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceCCUWVU
pass rate, all downs53%30th24%135th
pass rate, standard downs42%64th15%136th
pass rate, 1st down40%93rd11%137th
no-huddle share71%60th99%2nd
pass rate, passing downs73%28th51%125th
pass rate, red zone53%13th11%136th
seconds per play (own drives)26.8106th24.7129th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

CCU offence

CCU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.15726269 of 138
success rate0.412262100 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4292629 of 138
rush: points added per play0.10226277 of 138
rush: success rate0.44426276 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87826291 of 138
pass: points added per play0.24026270 of 138
pass: success rate0.383262109 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.9982624 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.440262118 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.36526235 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.41426227 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17726284 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.69226295 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.58326290 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.195262130 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.126262128 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.069262108 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10026259 of 138

WVU offence

WVU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.18429662 of 138
success rate0.44929660 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20529683 of 138
rush: points added per play0.15229658 of 138
rush: success rate0.46829652 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.93629678 of 138
pass: points added per play0.30729655 of 138
pass: success rate0.40029699 of 138
pass: explosiveness2.2262961 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.49129673 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.32929660 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.24729650 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13529633 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72029688 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.03429664 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11129626 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07829649 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03429620 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60029668 of 138

CCU defence

CCU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.09526483 of 138
success rate0.451264117 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.9392642 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.00526457 of 138
rush: success rate0.444264105 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.5542648 of 138
pass: points added per play0.446264129 of 138
pass: success rate0.489264126 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.58926484 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.505264115 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27426460 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.182264112 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.1232648 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.810264109 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.16026457 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14826446 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.09826467 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.04926437 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.00026447 of 138

WVU defence

WVU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.12428096 of 138
success rate0.443280108 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.18128051 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.02528046 of 138
rush: success rate0.39128061 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.84128037 of 138
pass: points added per play0.336280117 of 138
pass: success rate0.511280134 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.44228044 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.520280125 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.26228052 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.90228078 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.20328081 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.70628066 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.26928063 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15428055 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.11428098 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.03928016 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.70028088 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs