Texas · away
at
—
Friday 2026-11-27 19:30 · Kyle Field
Texas A&M · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TA&M pass rush3.1% 97104th8.8% 21671stfaces TEX7.5% 133103rd5.3% ~1.8 sacks
TEX pass rush9.4% 12815th12.8% 25012thfaces TA&M5.5% 14579th7.4% ~2.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TEX with the ball

TEX offence vs TA&M defenceTEX offenceTA&M defencerank gap
points added per play0.11090th0.03368th-22
success rate0.45556th0.38562nd+6
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143112th1.30798th-14
rush: points added per play0.04795th-0.07932nd-63
rush: success rate0.45865th0.36644th-21
rush: explosiveness0.790117th0.84136th-81
pass: points added per play0.28063rd0.21892nd+29
pass: success rate0.46254th0.40877th+23
pass: explosiveness1.56266th1.851130th+64
standard downs: success rate0.50062nd0.42651st-11
passing downs: success rate0.36239th0.28170th+31
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.818109th2.76459th-50
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18390th0.17945th-45
short-yardage conversion rate0.75071st0.71469th-2
points per trip inside the 404.25054th3.05354th0
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.171111th0.17787th-24
havoc allowed by the front seven0.130131st0.115100th-31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04137th0.06271st+34
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.900111th——

TA&M with the ball

TA&M offence vs TEX defenceTA&M offenceTEX defencerank gap
points added per play0.043111th-0.05629th-82
success rate0.44367th0.35029th-38
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.074131st1.09427th-104
rush: points added per play0.09481st-0.07433rd-48
rush: success rate0.49728th0.36543rd+15
rush: explosiveness0.820110th0.79126th-84
pass: points added per play0.022119th-0.03322nd-97
pass: success rate0.385107th0.33118th-89
pass: explosiveness1.405112th1.43236th-76
standard downs: success rate0.47886th0.39726th-60
passing downs: success rate0.36634th0.24738th+4
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21657th2.55437th-20
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16665th0.19876th+11
short-yardage conversion rate0.85015th0.73378th+63
points per trip inside the 404.36043rd2.19010th-33
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16193rd0.206124th+31
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07746th0.141126th+80
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084130th0.06584th-46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400116th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.