Florida · neutral site
vs
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 15:30 · Mercedes-Benz Stadium
Georgia · neutral site
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UGA pass rush5.2% 11667th8.6% 19774thfaces FLA4.0% 7549th4.6% ~1.5 sacks
FLA pass rush6.2% 13046th8.5% 21376thfaces UGA5.3% 7673rd5.7% ~1.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

FLA with the ball

FLA offence vs UGA defenceFLA offenceUGA defencerank gap
points added per play0.4137th-0.14310th+3
success rate0.51610th0.33117th+7
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30237th1.09224th-13
rush: points added per play0.3416th-0.4201st-5
rush: success rate0.48040th0.2674th-36
rush: explosiveness1.13315th0.4965th-10
pass: points added per play0.5998th0.06749th+41
pass: success rate0.5855th0.37952nd+47
pass: explosiveness1.55768th1.43438th-30
standard downs: success rate0.57111th0.42249th+38
passing downs: success rate0.35643rd0.1906th-37
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23253rd2.0304th-49
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13329th0.21696th+67
short-yardage conversion rate1.0001st0.54513th+12
points per trip inside the 405.5482nd3.00047th+45
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09110th0.188108th+98
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05314th0.124112th+98
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03931st0.06479th+48
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400114th——

UGA with the ball

UGA offence vs FLA defenceUGA offenceFLA defencerank gap
points added per play0.4254th-0.03636th+32
success rate0.5336th0.40577th+71
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30139th1.14641st+2
rush: points added per play0.3289th-0.06335th+26
rush: success rate0.51618th0.39160th+42
rush: explosiveness1.06828th0.88057th+29
pass: points added per play0.5679th0.11665th+56
pass: success rate0.55612th0.42998th+86
pass: explosiveness1.54172nd1.30515th-57
standard downs: success rate0.6015th0.44363rd+58
passing downs: success rate0.32265th0.31499th+34
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.69110th3.046102nd+92
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11914th0.1092nd-12
short-yardage conversion rate0.8829th0.72271st+62
points per trip inside the 405.8211st4.045115th+114
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12036th0.204120th+84
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07441st0.11496th+55
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04550th0.090127th+77
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.000130th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.