Tennessee · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Williams-Brice Stadium
South Carolina · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SC pass rush7.2% 8334th12.1% 16518thfaces TENN10.2% 88131st8.7% ~2.9 sacks
TENN pass rush11.7% 1036th10.7% 18729thfaces SC4.6% 10862nd8.1% ~2.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TENN with the ball

TENN offence vs SC defenceTENN offenceSC defencerank gap
points added per play0.22452nd0.151104th+52
success rate0.45654th0.36243rd-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20878th1.556137th+59
rush: points added per play0.31112th-0.05238th+26
rush: success rate0.48537th0.32725th-12
rush: explosiveness1.11320th1.027100th+80
pass: points added per play0.17290th0.466134th+44
pass: success rate0.43176th0.41278th+2
pass: explosiveness1.361119th1.903133rd+14
standard downs: success rate0.51745th0.39023rd-22
passing downs: success rate0.30084th0.315101st+17
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.54016th2.29314th-2
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13836th0.243115th+79
short-yardage conversion rate0.83324th0.63637th+13
points per trip inside the 405.3085th5.059134th+129
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14373rd0.13635th-38
havoc allowed by the front seven0.101101st0.08954th-47
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04241st0.04734th-7
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60067th——

SC with the ball

SC offence vs TENN defenceSC offenceTENN defencerank gap
points added per play0.22751st-0.08622nd-29
success rate0.47643rd0.35839th-4
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22868th1.06418th-50
rush: points added per play0.30214th0.08190th+76
rush: success rate0.52611th0.36542nd+31
rush: explosiveness1.04739th1.02699th+60
pass: points added per play0.17589th-0.1446th-83
pass: success rate0.41589th0.37955th-34
pass: explosiveness1.52176th1.0951st-75
standard downs: success rate0.54929th0.40634th+5
passing downs: success rate0.28496th0.27258th-38
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.7229th3.03199th+90
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13024th0.19164th+40
short-yardage conversion rate0.78947th0.75088th+41
points per trip inside the 404.29649th2.22711th-38
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12239th0.218129th+90
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06827th0.148129th+102
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05472nd0.07097th+25
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80019th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.