The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TA&M pass rush | 3.1% 97104th | 8.8% 21671st | faces | — | — |
| pass rush | — | — | faces TA&M | 5.5% 14579th | — |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
null with the ball
| offence vs TA&M defence | offence | TA&M defence | rank gap |
|---|
TA&M with the ball
| TA&M offence vs defence | TA&M offence | defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.043111th | — | — |
| success rate | 0.44367th | — | — |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.074131st | — | — |
| rush: points added per play | 0.09481st | — | — |
| rush: success rate | 0.49728th | — | — |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.820110th | — | — |
| pass: points added per play | 0.022119th | — | — |
| pass: success rate | 0.385107th | — | — |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.405112th | — | — |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.47886th | — | — |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.36634th | — | — |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.21657th | — | — |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16665th | — | — |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.85015th | — | — |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.36043rd | — | — |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.16193rd | — | — |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07746th | — | — |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.084130th | — | — |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 67.400116th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.