Kentucky · away
at
Final UK 31 – 21 TA&M
Saturday 2026-09-19 15:30 · Kyle Field
Texas A&M · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TA&M pass rush3.1% 97104th8.8% 21671stfaces UK8.6% 81119th5.9% ~1.9 sacks
UK pass rush5.0% 11971st6.4% 218118thfaces TA&M5.5% 14579th5.3% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UK with the ball

UK offence vs TA&M defenceUK offenceTA&M defencerank gap
points added per play0.23647th0.03368th+21
success rate0.51612th0.38562nd+50
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20384th1.30798th+14
rush: points added per play0.20937th-0.07932nd-5
rush: success rate0.5487th0.36644th+37
rush: explosiveness0.94875th0.84136th-39
pass: points added per play0.26766th0.21892nd+26
pass: success rate0.46353rd0.40877th+24
pass: explosiveness1.58460th1.851130th+70
standard downs: success rate0.57112th0.42651st+39
passing downs: success rate0.32166th0.28170th+4
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.46025th2.76459th+34
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15656th0.17945th-11
short-yardage conversion rate0.76557th0.71469th+12
points per trip inside the 404.87520th3.05354th+34
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13561st0.17787th+26
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09177th0.115100th+23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04447th0.06271st+24
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.10096th——

TA&M with the ball

TA&M offence vs UK defenceTA&M offenceUK defencerank gap
points added per play0.043111th0.01657th-54
success rate0.44367th0.41788th+21
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.074131st1.19055th-76
rush: points added per play0.09481st0.141113th+32
rush: success rate0.49728th0.43293rd+65
rush: explosiveness0.820110th1.077114th+4
pass: points added per play0.022119th-0.03720th-99
pass: success rate0.385107th0.41887th-20
pass: explosiveness1.405112th1.28711th-101
standard downs: success rate0.47886th0.44869th-17
passing downs: success rate0.36634th0.348121st+87
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21657th2.80665th+8
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16665th0.16835th-30
short-yardage conversion rate0.85015th0.77899th+84
points per trip inside the 404.36043rd3.57782nd+39
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16193rd0.183100th+7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07746th0.08343rd-3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084130th0.100134th+4
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400116th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.