The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
SC
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 74.0 |
| Drives per game | 11.8 |
| SP+ | 7.5 (48th, offence 39th, defence 51st) |
| Returning production | 69% (pass 65%, rush 80%, receiving 67%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | SC |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 48%71st |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 42%67th |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 43%67th |
| no-huddle share | — | 52%80th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 63%73rd |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 42%50th |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 26.0122nd |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
SC offence
| SC offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.227 | 296 | 51 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.476 | 296 | 43 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.228 | 296 | 68 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.302 | 296 | 14 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.526 | 296 | 11 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.047 | 296 | 39 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.175 | 296 | 89 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.415 | 296 | 89 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.521 | 296 | 76 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.549 | 296 | 29 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.284 | 296 | 96 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.722 | 296 | 9 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.130 | 296 | 24 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.789 | 296 | 47 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.296 | 296 | 49 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.122 | 296 | 39 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.068 | 296 | 27 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.054 | 296 | 72 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 73.800 | 296 | 19 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
SC defence
| SC defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.151 | 235 | 104 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.362 | 235 | 43 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.556 | 235 | 137 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | -0.052 | 235 | 38 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.327 | 235 | 25 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.027 | 235 | 100 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.466 | 235 | 134 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.412 | 235 | 78 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.903 | 235 | 133 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.390 | 235 | 23 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.315 | 235 | 101 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.293 | 235 | 14 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.243 | 235 | 115 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.636 | 235 | 37 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 5.059 | 235 | 134 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.136 | 235 | 35 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.089 | 235 | 54 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.047 | 235 | 34 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 71.600 | 235 | 61 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs