Arkansas · away
at
Final ARK 10 – 43 UTAH
Saturday 2026-09-12 22:15 · Rice-Eccles Stadium
Utah · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTAH pass rush7.1% 12736th10.3% 20436thfaces ARK6.6% 13691st6.9% ~2.3 sacks
ARK pass rush7.0% 8639th8.5% 17775thfaces UTAH3.2% 9529th5.1% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ARK with the ball

ARK offence vs UTAH defenceARK offenceUTAH defencerank gap
points added per play0.049109th-0.07424th-85
success rate0.42290th0.31911th-79
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.118120th1.337108th-12
rush: points added per play-0.075125th-0.09230th-95
rush: success rate0.386116th0.32423rd-93
rush: explosiveness0.566137th0.94479th-58
pass: points added per play0.18186th-0.08314th-72
pass: success rate0.45059th0.31013th-46
pass: explosiveness1.46095th1.60692nd-3
standard downs: success rate0.48577th0.3405th-72
passing downs: success rate0.31269th0.29182nd+13
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.579127th2.63250th-77
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.18187th0.20482nd-5
short-yardage conversion rate0.84217th0.50010th-7
points per trip inside the 403.50093rd2.27812th-81
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.180122nd0.204123rd+1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09280th0.08546th-34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.088135th0.119138th+3
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20057th——

UTAH with the ball

UTAH offence vs ARK defenceUTAH offenceARK defencerank gap
points added per play0.32815th0.158106th+91
success rate0.50719th0.43299th+80
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.32130th1.11028th-2
rush: points added per play0.28517th0.193126th+109
rush: success rate0.49032nd0.460113th+81
rush: explosiveness1.16711th0.90668th+57
pass: points added per play0.39731st0.16077th+46
pass: success rate0.52915th0.41886th+71
pass: explosiveness1.51777th1.36323rd-54
standard downs: success rate0.53437th0.527129th+92
passing downs: success rate0.42410th0.1885th-5
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.47923rd3.226117th+94
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19597th0.15024th-73
short-yardage conversion rate0.73976th0.875128th+52
points per trip inside the 404.96916th5.143135th+119
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12846th0.14441st-5
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08874th0.09663rd-11
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04035th0.04836th+1
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.500127th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.