Kent State · away
at
Final KENT 0 – 57 SC
Saturday 2026-09-05 12:45 · Williams-Brice Stadium
South Carolina · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SC pass rush7.2% 8334th12.1% 16518thfaces KENT2.8% 7222nd5.0% ~1.7 sacks
KENT pass rush3.3% 90100th8.0% 18883rdfaces SC4.6% 10862nd4.0% ~1.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

KENT with the ball

KENT offence vs SC defenceKENT offenceSC defencerank gap
points added per play-0.028126th0.151104th-22
success rate0.313137th0.36243rd-94
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.36822nd1.556137th+115
rush: points added per play-0.079129th-0.05238th-91
rush: success rate0.331135th0.32725th-110
rush: explosiveness0.97267th1.027100th+33
pass: points added per play0.126100th0.466134th+34
pass: success rate0.296135th0.41278th-57
pass: explosiveness1.9785th1.903133rd+128
standard downs: success rate0.372136th0.39023rd-113
passing downs: success rate0.224129th0.315101st-28
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.778113th2.29314th-99
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.223123rd0.243115th-8
short-yardage conversion rate0.615118th0.63637th-81
points per trip inside the 402.895125th5.059134th+9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16398th0.13635th-63
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08563rd0.08954th-9
havoc allowed by the secondary0.077121st0.04734th-87
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60012th——

SC with the ball

SC offence vs KENT defenceSC offenceKENT defencerank gap
points added per play0.22751st0.201121st+70
success rate0.47643rd0.474133rd+90
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22868th1.27289th+21
rush: points added per play0.30214th0.133109th+95
rush: success rate0.52611th0.43498th+87
rush: explosiveness1.04739th0.89061st+22
pass: points added per play0.17589th0.312115th+26
pass: success rate0.41589th0.517135th+46
pass: explosiveness1.52176th1.55571st-5
standard downs: success rate0.54929th0.556137th+108
passing downs: success rate0.28496th0.26149th-47
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.7229th3.189113th+104
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13024th0.15628th+4
short-yardage conversion rate0.78947th0.842120th+73
points per trip inside the 404.29649th5.261137th+88
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12239th0.14139th0
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06827th0.10072nd+45
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05472nd0.04017th-55
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.80019th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.