UTEP · away
at
Final UTEP 0 – 51 OU
Friday 2026-09-04 20:00 · Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK)
Oklahoma · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
OU pass rush14.0% 932nd12.8% 21913thfaces UTEP21.1% 71137th17.6% ~5.8 sacks
UTEP pass rush1.2% 83133rd6.0% 183124thfaces OU6.0% 11787th3.6% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UTEP with the ball

UTEP offence vs OU defenceUTEP offenceOU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.179138th-0.1822nd-136
success rate0.367124th0.3046th-118
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092127th1.23574th-53
rush: points added per play-0.197136th-0.10427th-109
rush: success rate0.357128th0.28710th-118
rush: explosiveness0.86795th1.171129th+34
pass: points added per play-0.037131st-0.1624th-127
pass: success rate0.40297th0.33722nd-75
pass: explosiveness1.371118th1.32216th-102
standard downs: success rate0.442115th0.3334th-111
passing downs: success rate0.200135th0.24737th-98
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.516133rd2.36420th-113
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.240131st0.19470th-61
short-yardage conversion rate0.500135th0.58321st-114
points per trip inside the 401.700136th2.0838th-128
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.217137th0.216128th-9
havoc allowed by the front seven0.173137th0.145128th-9
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04448th0.07096th+48
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.800100th——

OU with the ball

OU offence vs UTEP defenceOU offenceUTEP defencerank gap
points added per play-0.045129th0.252130th+1
success rate0.392113th0.472131st+18
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.112123rd1.20963rd-60
rush: points added per play-0.260137th0.136112th-25
rush: success rate0.362125th0.439104th-21
rush: explosiveness0.542138th0.92271st-67
pass: points added per play0.29358th0.512137th+79
pass: success rate0.43175th0.528138th+63
pass: explosiveness1.71431st1.57178th+47
standard downs: success rate0.432123rd0.508116th-7
passing downs: success rate0.30477th0.369129th+52
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.603126th2.96991st-35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.223124th0.223105th-19
short-yardage conversion rate0.462136th0.66752nd-84
points per trip inside the 403.389102nd4.500128th+26
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15789th0.12617th-72
havoc allowed by the front seven0.118123rd0.09459th-64
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03933rd0.0314th-29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.40042nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.