East Carolina · away
at
Final ECU 10 – 48 ALA
Saturday 2026-09-05 12:00 · Bryant-Denny Stadium
Alabama · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ALA pass rush8.5% 11822nd9.9% 23345thfaces ECU7.3% 8299th7.9% ~2.6 sacks
ECU pass rush3.7% 8193rd12.0% 20919thfaces ALA5.9% 11885th4.8% ~1.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ECU with the ball

ECU offence vs ALA defenceECU offenceALA defencerank gap
points added per play0.056106th-0.09820th-86
success rate0.401105th0.34123rd-82
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.166100th1.382122nd+22
rush: points added per play-0.067124th-0.17413th-111
rush: success rate0.368121st0.31115th-106
rush: explosiveness0.836105th0.91369th-36
pass: points added per play0.21076th-0.01827th-49
pass: success rate0.42482nd0.35832nd-50
pass: explosiveness1.49785th1.826124th+39
standard downs: success rate0.49171st0.39124th-47
passing downs: success rate0.200134th0.25040th-94
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431136th2.1988th-128
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19798th0.244116th+18
short-yardage conversion rate0.72781st0.56214th-67
points per trip inside the 403.238110th3.824101st-9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.182124th0.189111th-13
havoc allowed by the front seven0.116120th0.10887th-33
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066100th0.080114th+14
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.40025th——

ALA with the ball

ALA offence vs ECU defenceALA offenceECU defencerank gap
points added per play0.32716th-0.01842nd+26
success rate0.49429th0.35435th+6
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.33226th1.313101st+75
rush: points added per play0.23728th0.02467th+39
rush: success rate0.50024th0.37047th+23
rush: explosiveness1.10721st1.183131st+110
pass: points added per play0.47020th-0.00231st+11
pass: success rate0.49134th0.34525th-9
pass: explosiveness1.62852nd1.54065th+13
standard downs: success rate0.54133rd0.37114th-19
passing downs: success rate0.37033rd0.327109th+76
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99389th2.25211th-78
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.209111th0.291134th+23
short-yardage conversion rate0.77849th0.58320th-29
points per trip inside the 405.3574th2.84637th+33
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15484th0.194113th+29
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09790th0.160131st+41
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05675th0.0359th-66
average starting field position (yards from own goal)66.400122nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.